By submitting this form, you agree to our 

In recent years, the software supply chain has become a prime target for attackers. From dependency vulnerabilities to third-party risks in DevOps, organizations face mounting challenges to keep their software secure and uncompromised. Traditional security models no longer hold up. Adversaries are exploiting every stage of the pipeline, from code through deployment.

This is why the role that DevOps teams play in security has become more significant than ever. Speed and agility are no longer the only concerns for DevOps; it is now resilience and trust with risk management. Organizations can keep ahead of threats by ensuring that security is incorporated in all stages of the development and delivery lifecycle, and minimize their exposure to software supply chain threats.

The guide gives a simple, high-level overview of how supply chain security in DevOps operates, challenges that organizations face, and what strategies organizations can adopt to reduce risks. This complete guide comes with a 101 explanation of how DevOps enhances security in your organization.

A software supply chain risk is any weakness, vulnerability, or exposure that gets into your system via the components, tools, and processes of building and delivering software. Since modern applications are dependent on countless third-party libraries, external services, and automated pipelines, organizations face the risks associated therewith.

The majority of applications rely on open-source libraries and frameworks. In case such dependencies have unpatched vulnerabilities, attackers would use them for access.

Vendors, contractors, and external integrations can accidentally place insecure code, improper configurations, or malicious programs into the environment.

Build and deployment pipelines are prime targets. Once attackers gain access, they can insert malicious code or modify software before it goes into production.

Packages, binaries, and containers available in repositories can be abused in case they are not secured and validated correctly. It can lead to the distribution of poisoned releases to the customers.

Attackers can intentionally introduce malicious code into dependencies or update streams to attack software integrity.

Risk may be deliberately or accidentally brought in by employees or contractors who have high access. They have the ability to bypass the controls or have sensitive information mismanaged.

Lack of visibility into licensing, provenance, and security standards elevates risk to legal and operational risks.

In the absence of vulnerabilities, real-time monitoring and suspicious activities can be identified only after they have been exploited.

Why DevOps plays a key role in supply chain security

The old model of software security, which implements verification at the end of software development, is no longer able to cope with the current threat environment. Modern software is developed and deployed in a continuous manner with the help of code contributed by multiple developers, open-source ecosystems, and cloud-native infrastructures. Such an interconnected environment needs a new model of security that keeps up with the same development pace. 

This is where DevOps comes in. By inserting security directly in the delivery pipeline and development, organizations can detect and remove threats prior to production. Security in DevOps supply chains guarantees trust and integrity throughout the lifecycle, including source code to deployment.

Here are the key reasons why DevOps is essential for securing the software supply chain:

The greatest myth about security is that it slows down development. As a matter of fact, DevOps enables an organization to integrate security into its current work processes, which helps teams develop quickly and remain secure. Automated vulnerability scanning, policy enforcement, and patching can ensure that faster releases do not produce new risks.

Manual security checks are subject to supervision. Using DevOps, organizations can make security controls, such as dependency scanning or artifact validation. This does not only minimizes errors but also offers continuous safeguarding against threats that arise in real-time.

DevOps focuses on transparency. Teams obtain end-to-end visibility of the entire pipeline, from the source of dependencies to the integrity of artifacts in repositories. This visibility helps detect suspicious changes early, supporting continuous security monitoring across the lifecycle.

Regulatory demands are becoming increasingly complex, and hence, compliance cannot be an afterthought. DevOps permits DevOps governance and compliance frameworks, in which licensing, data protection, and security standard checks are incorporated in the delivery pipeline. This minimizes the chances of penalties that follow non-compliance and promotes accountability.

Traditional models discover risks too late, often after deployment. DevOps makes sure that vulnerabilities (for example, dependency vulnerabilities and misconfigurations) are identified during development or build stages. This risk management approach of DevOps avoids expensive remedies and minimizes the exposure.

Now, security is no longer the responsibility of an individual team. DevOps is based on the principle of a shared responsibility model in which developers, security experts, and operations teams collaborate. This partnership will make sure that DevOps security best practices are implemented in all workflows.

 offers an opportunity to change the paradigm of reactive defence and move to proactive prevention by combining speed, automation, and governance. The outcome is a secure software delivery lifecycle that shields both organizations and customers against supply chain threats.

What role does artifact management play in software supply chain risk?

Artifact management is a core pillar of DevOps supply chain security because it ensures that every software component—packages, binaries, containers, dependencies, and metadata—is stored, tracked, and delivered securely. A secure 

 prevents tampering, unauthorized access, and the introduction of malicious or unverified packages into the DevOps pipeline.

By centralizing and governing all build outputs, artifact management helps organizations:

Verify the authenticity and integrity of artifacts before deployment

Reduce dependency vulnerabilities and third-party risk in DevOps

Strengthen DevOps risk management with full traceability

Enforce consistent policies across environments

Maintain trusted sources for all production releases

 also enable continuous scanning, SBOM generation, and governance controls—making them critical for mitigating software supply chain risks and securing fast-moving CI/CD workflows.

Common supply chain security risks in DevOps

Despite sound DevOps practices, organizations face risks related to the speed and complexity of modern software delivery. These risks also tend to rise out of the tools and processes that render DevOps effective.

Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery (CI/CD) pipelines automate the process of code flowing between development and production. Nevertheless, in case the attackers crack into a pipeline, they are able to inject malicious code, steal credentials, or tamper with builds. Weak access controls, poor secret management, and the absence of integrity checks create serious vulnerabilities.

2. Third-party dependencies and open source

Third-party integrations and open-source libraries are fast to innovate, but this increases the attack surface. When an outdated dependency, abandoned dependency, or compromised dependency is used, it may result in critical dependency vulnerabilities spreading across the application.

Repositories hold applications’ software artifacts like containers, packages, binaries, and so on. However, if these repositories have a shortage of integrity validation, version control, or proper access policies, attackers can poison artifacts, resulting in downstream compromise. Artifact repository security is important to safeguard against tampering.

Employees, contractors, or partners with privileged access can intentionally or accidentally introduce risks. In the absence of granular permissions, monitoring, and auditing, insider threats still constitute one of the most overlooked aspects of DevOps risk management.

DevOps is fast-driven, but without organized policies and controls, compliance can languish. Lack of proper DevOps governance and compliance poses risks associated with data privacy, licensing breaches, and regulatory fines.

The fast-paced nature of DevOps often results in a lack of monitoring. Without continuous security monitoring, new vulnerabilities or attacks may exist under the carpet until it is too late.

How DevOps mitigates software supply chain risks

The actual power of DevOps is that it unites speed and control. By integrating security into workflows and automation of controls, DevOps reshapes supply chain security from a reactive process into a proactive approach. The following are the main lifecycle-wide risk mitigation benefits of DevOps:

1. Building a secure software delivery lifecycle

The software delivery lifecycle of a DevOps environment is continuous, meaning vulnerabilities can propagate rapidly unless controlled. A secure software delivery lifecycle (SDLC) makes sure that all the phases of software development—from planning to deployment—have inbuilt security.

This practice implies that when vulnerabilities are identified at an earlier stage, they are cheaper and easier to fix. Code analysis, dependency verification, and security checks are all part of pipelines and not a one time assessment. The outcome is a development cycle that results in trusted, secure, and reliable releases.

2. Applying DevOps security best practices

The basis of protection against threats to the supply chain is laid in the form of DevOps security best practices. These are regular code reviews, automatic vulnerability scanning, and patching. When these practices are codified into pipelines, security becomes part of the process rather than a point of congestion.

Additional best practices are restricting access to sensitive repositories, rotating secrets, and adopting least-privilege considerations. A combination of these reduces both external and insider threats.

Attackers usually target CI/CD pipelines as they determine how code reaches production. The safety of 

 is ensured through the implementation of access controls, anomaly detection, and verification of all the build artifacts.

Embracing zero trust in the software supply chain implies that no step in the pipeline is implicitly trusted—all processes, dependencies, and artifacts must be tested. This significantly decreases the chances of tampering with the pipeline or unauthorized changes to code.

4. Leveraging the software bill of materials (SBOM)

 (SBOM) in DevOps is one of the most powerful tools for securing modern supply chains. An SBOM is a comprehensive list of components, dependencies, and open-source libraries that are utilized in an application.

With such a degree of transparency, organizations will be able to soon identify whether they are disclosed to newly discovered vulnerabilities. SBOMs also help in compliance by demonstrating that software components can fulfill security and licensing specifications.

5. Strengthening cloud-native supply chain security

Cloud-native supply chain security becomes important when organizations transition to containerized and microservices-based architectures. New attack surfaces, that are presented by containers, orchestrators, and serverless functions need to be secured.

Container image scanning, runtime monitoring, and Kubernetes (or other orchestration platform) policy enforcement are best practices in this context. The above measures will guarantee the ability to expand workloads safely without creating new vulnerabilities in the ecosystem.

6. Implementing risk mitigation strategies in DevOps

Good risk mitigation practices in DevOps extend beyond technical controls- including processes and governance. Automated incident response, compliance audits, and ongoing risk assessment enable organizations to react more quickly to growing threats.

Cultural change is also needed in risk mitigation. Security should be treated as a team effort where developers, operations, and security experts work in harmony. This cultural alignment ensures resiliency in the entire software supply chain.

7. Using DevOps tools for supply chain security

Various tools are available to strengthen supply chain security in the DevOps processes. DevOps tools for supply chain security include artifact repositories imposing trust, dependency vulnerability scanners, and monitoring platforms that detect suspicious activity.

These tools will offer constant guardrails without slowing down delivery when included in CI/CD pipelines. The process is not only about using the tools; the most important thing is to make sure that they are embedded into the pipeline in a form that creates consistency across all builds and releases.

By combining these strategies, DevOps will make security a facilitator and not a barrier. Organizations that integrate these practices into their pipelines generate a solid structure where supply chain risks are continuously monitored, mitigated, and addressed

It is not only a list of tools that is needed to mitigate software supply chain risks, but it is also a process-driven and cultural change in the way organizations approach development and operations. The following are the best practices that organizations need to embrace to enhance the security of their supply chain within DevOps:

1. Integrate security early and continuously

Security should not be bolted on at the end of development. Rather, integrate it throughout the beginning and the entire lifecycle. This implies the inclusion of security checks in source code repositories, builds, and deployments.

DevOps security best practices ensure that vulnerabilities are detected at the time of writing code or pulling in dependencies rather than after deployment. When detected earlier, it cuts down the cost of remediation and acts before the risks can move downstream.

Compliance requirements are becoming strict across industries. DevOps governance and compliance policies need to be part of the organizational workflows.

This includes imposing a licensing check on open-source libraries, ensuring that the code is within regulatory standards, and maintaining audit logs. Effective governance not only mitigates financial and legal risk but also fosters customer and regulator trust.

3. Focus on continuous monitoring and threat detection

The velocity of DevOps implies that deploying a new piece of code occurs regularly, and risks can occur at an equivalent rate. Organizations need to implement ongoing security controls to monitor activity within pipelines, repositories, and production environments.

Anomaly alerts in real time, auto-responses to suspicious behaviors, and connections with SIEM systems help to make sure that threats are detected before they harm the system. Monitoring also offers valuable insights for improving future defenses.

The use of hundreds of third-party libraries, tools, and vendor integrations is central to modern applications. Both introduce third-party risk in DevOps that needs to be addressed carefully.

Organizations are supposed to have a list of all third-party components, check their security posture, and regularly update or replace old dependencies. Reduced inherited risk can also be achieved through vetting the vendors to practice supply chain security themselves.

Moving processes manually is liable to errors and cannot be used at the pace of modern DevOps. Consistency, accuracy, and reliability are attained through automation.

Some of the fields that can be automated are dependency scanning, verification of artifacts, vulnerability patching, and compliance checks. By making automation a core part of risk mitigation strategies in DevOps, organizations ensure that protection keeps pace with delivery velocity.

The weak point of the supply chain is usually trust. 

 strategy makes sure that all the processes, dependencies, and artifacts are validated prior to use.

The principle works in pipelines, repositories, and production environments. By eliminating implicit trust, organizations reduce the risk of malicious code being absorbed through an undetected method.

Finally, tools and policies are effective only when they are adopted by the teams. Companies need to embed a security-first culture in their environment, in which developers, operations, and security professionals are held accountable for protecting the security of the supply chain.

Parul Jhawar

Marketing

The DevOps Guide to Mitigating Software Supply Chain Risks

the artifact management market is up for grabs

. In a hot market, you’re going to see some interesting and not-entirely-logical attacks. And if I could creatively paraphrase 

, it’s hard to get someone to understand something when their company’s success depends on them not understanding it.

I’m thinking about a curious criticism that one of our competitors, JFrog, leveled at us in a 

. They said they spotted some “red flags” about Cloudsmith, the first and most damning being that we are “

packaging [a] competitor’s open source as an enterprise solution,

[s]elling a paid ‘security’ solution that’s little more than a thin UI layer over someone else’s open-source tool.

 and the underlying Trivy DB as one source of software package vulnerability data.)

They stick to this point pretty persistently, saying we are “

charging you for an open-source solution,” 

rely on open source software as [our] SCA solution,

“if Trivy becomes unsupported or compromised, Cloudsmith’s entire SCA capability could suffer, leaving users vulnerable.

JFrog has it wrong on several counts here.

For starters, pretty much every enterprise tool in the last few decades, including 

, is built on foundations of open-source software (OSS). Does this mean we’re all “charging” customers for “packaging” OSS as an “enterprise solution” in some nefarious way? Like most OSS, Trivy DB is “generic by nature,” which leaves room for developers and software vendors to build custom capabilities on top of it. Which is exactly what Cloudsmith has done. If Cloudsmith is wrong for using “generic” OSS, then we’re all wrong.

In accusing Cloudsmith of using a “competitor’s” OSS, they’re referring to Aqua Security. They’re confused on several key points.

First, they’re failing to acknowledge the distinction between the role of a primary OSS maintainer and a commercial vendor. Aqua Security, the company, is the primary maintainer of the Trivy OSS project. It is also the vendor behind Aqua Enterprise, a commercial product that is built around Trivy.

Second, they’ve tellingly assumed that Cloudsmith considers Aqua Security to be a competitor. We very much don’t. We regard Aqua as a complementary solution; we support integration between Cloudsmith and Aqua Security; and we see Cloudsmith as the data plane & control plane for software supply chain security, so customers can process metadata and execute policies based on vulnerabilities identified by Cloudsmith’s scanning process, or sourced from third-party vulnerability data from the likes of Aqua Enterprise or others, or a combination.

 software can “become unsupported.” But that actually tends to be a much bigger risk with commercial software than with OSS. Trivy is published under an Apache 2.0 license. Even if the maintainers stop publishing future versions as open source, the community could fork an older version. We don’t think this will happen, but if it does, Cloudsmith relies on multiple data sources, and we can easily change our mix from time to time. There are numerous other providers of data similar to Trivy’s.

So why is JFrog attacking Cloudsmith so stridently for relying on OSS, like virtually every commercial software company does, and specifically for relying on Trivy? I can only speculate, but JFrog sees its own security product, Xray, as an important revenue source, and they seem to regard Aqua Security, along with other similar companies, as competitors to Xray.

To state the obvious point: of course we embrace open source. 

 about Cloudsmith’s support for OSS projects, and we Cloudsmithers all believe deeply in the power of software reuse via OSS. I’m old enough to remember when reuse was essentially an unsolved problem in software; we never could have envisioned back in the 1990s how OSS would fundamentally change that. The core functionality of our platform helps enterprises everywhere to efficiently and securely manage the thousands of OSS artifacts and dependencies that make up such a large part of any company’s software supply chain.

And to state another obvious point: we’re not just serving up generic OSS and then somehow convincing customers to pay us for it. It’s what Cloudsmith has built on top of OSS that we’re really charging for. Things like our unmatched global cloud-scale infrastructure, our 24x7 service levels, our policy-as-code enterprise policy manager (EPM) that evaluates every package using your company’s risk criteria, our ability to proxy and cache public upstream registries at unmatched performance levels, our artifact synchronization process that performs scanning and metadata enrichment before a package even hits your repository and gets served to CI/CD pipelines or developer IDEs, our stellar customer support, and much more.

Yes, we rely on OSS, and we think that’s a significant strength from which customers benefit.


Glenn Weinstein

Of Course We Embrace Open Source!

Pulling Docker images from private registries for containerised applications presents a security challenge. It requires authentication management, network access, and trust across distributed systems. Credentials must be securely handled and rotated, and image pulls can break due to network restrictions or expired tokens. All of this makes deployment and security harder.

To address this, you can use OpenID Connect (OIDC) when pulling Docker images from Cloudsmith into Kubernetes. OIDC adds a layer to OAuth 2.0 that identifies who is making the request. Cloudsmith can then verify that the requests come from a trusted source and can grant short-lived access tokens. So you no longer have to rely on long-lived credentials, enhancing security and simplifying credential management.

Kubernetes clusters often need to pull Docker images from private registries like Cloudsmith. Traditionally, this meant storing long-lived credentials in the cluster, which has some security risks:

Credentials could be compromised if the cluster is breached.

Regular rotation of credentials becomes a manual, error-prone process.

It's hard to apply the principle of least privilege effectively.

Before we dive into the solution, let's review what an Image Pull Secret is in Kubernetes.

An Image Pull Secret is a way to pass credentials to the kubelet to authenticate with a private container registry. Typically, the secret contains:

While Image Pull Secrets solves the immediate authentication problem, using them with long-lived credentials still exposes us to the security risks mentioned earlier. The credentials don’t automatically expire, leaving them vulnerable to misuse if leaked or unrotated.

OpenID Connect (OIDC) allows us to use short-lived tokens instead of long-lived credentials, reducing risk exposure. Here's how it works in the context of Kubernetes and Cloudsmith:

Kubernetes has its own identity in the form of a service account. The service account has an associated JWT (JSON Web Token). During runtime, the following steps are taken:

Kubernetes issues the signed OIDC token (a JWT).

Cloudsmith receives and verifies the JWT and exchanges it for a short-lived Cloudsmith token.

Kubernetes uses the short-lived Cloudsmith token to create or update an Image Pull Secret.

At runtime, the pod requests to pull an image.

Kubernetes pulls an image from Cloudsmith using the Image Pull Secret for authentication.

To automate the process, we use a Kubernetes CronJob. This job runs at regular intervals and performs the following tasks:

Retrieves the Kubernetes service account token.

Exchange service account token for a Cloudsmith token via OIDC.

Create or update an Image Pull Secret with the new Cloudsmith token.

Here's an example of what this CronJob might look like:

2. Gets the Kubernetes service account token.

4. Creates or updates an Image Pull Secret named cloudsmith-pull-secret.

Implementing this OIDC-based solution offers significant benefits:

: The CronJob ensures the token is regularly refreshed, maintaining a good security posture without manual intervention.

: There's no need to manually update credentials, reducing operational overhead.

: The token only has the permissions it needs for a limited time, aligning with security best practices.

Once the Image Pull Secret is created or updated by the CronJob, you can use it in your pod specifications like this:

This pod will use the cloudsmith-pull-secret to authenticate with Cloudsmith and pull the specified image.

Using OIDC to pull Docker images from Cloudsmith into Kubernetes eliminates the need for long-lived credentials. It reduces the risk of leaked credentials, removes the need for manual credential rotation, and aligns with current security best practices.

Authentication in Kubernetes is evolving with significant recent enhancements. Kubernetes v1.20 saw the introduction of 

. These allow the kubelet to dynamically request credentials for a container registry instead of storing static credentials on disk. This was enhanced in v1.33 to support automatic use of the service account token for image pulls. This enables short-lived authentication without needing to manage Image Pull Secrets and reduces complexity. Cloudsmith remains vigilant, and these updates help with our goal of increasing automation in supply chain security.

Ian Taylor

Tech Content Director

Ian Duffy

Site Reliability Engineer

Secure Docker Image Pulls from Cloudsmith to Kubernetes using OIDC

In a world where digital threats lurk at every corner, securing your software supply chain is vital. Without proper tooling, you can’t adequately protect it.

Over the past few months, software supply chain attacks have compromised thousands of organizations. Okta, users of Progress Software's MOVEit file transfer app, and JetBrains’ TeamCity On-Premise development platform are just a few. In 2020, the notorious 

 infected more than 18,000 customers, including Microsoft, Intel, and roughly 100 other companies, as well as a dozen U.S. government agencies.

research suggests the financial impact of supply chain attacks is rising by 15% annually. They predict that the cost to businesses will reach $60 billion by 2025 and $138 billion by 2031. This alarming trend underscores the urgency for robust security measures and regular audits to safeguard against these evolving threats.

Software supply chain security involves protecting all aspects of the software development and deployment process. It's not just about the code you write, but also about the third-party components you integrate. Common threats include 

inadequate control over third-party libraries

. Open source software has accelerated the speed of development and delivery, and is present in an estimated 96% of computer software, according to the 

Open Source Security and Risk Analysis Report 2023.

 Every element, from source code to deployment, is a potential vulnerability point.

Ignoring these risks can lead to catastrophic data breaches and operational disruptions.

How can I mitigate my risk of exposure to a software supply chain attack?

A thorough security audit is essential for identifying and mitigating risks in your software supply chain. So where do you start?

1. Build an inventory of your software supply chain

Map your entire software supply chain to understand where vulnerabilities may exist. You need to list all of your software components, as each presents a potential risk. This includes the code your team writes and all the third party libraries, frameworks, and tools you use to build and deploy your software. Don’t forget about database systems, orchestration tools, and cloud services. For each component, understand its:

Without the right tooling this can be difficult, especially if you have multiple teams that are on different technology stacks or using separate DevOps tools. You need a fully-managed software supply chain product like 

 to know what artifacts your teams are using and where the potential risks lie.

Now that you have mapped each component in your software supply chain, you need to assess its security posture against known vulnerabilities and industry standards. Tools like 

, a free tool for analyzing the quality and security of OSS packages, cangive you insights into the quality and trustworthiness of open-source packages.In addition, standards like the 

 from OWASP can help you determine your dependencies and check them for publicly disclosed vulnerabilities.

Once you’ve identified potential vulnerabilities in your chain, it's time to formulate a plan to address identified vulnerabilities, including updating or replacing insecure components.This may include patching software, updating systems, changing code, or even replacing certain tools or components. It’s crucial to have a detailed action plan for each type of vulnerability.

Continuously monitor to protect your supply chain:

Your software supply chain is not static. Every day your development teams and the global open-source community make software changes that could impact your security. New vulnerabilities are being discovered and new threats emerge. To maintain security in your software supply chain, you must automate ongoing surveillance of the supply chain while enabling your developers to continue innovating at pace.

Use Cloudsmith to streamline your audit process and secure your software supply chain.

Build your software supply chain inventory

 by creating a single source of truth for all your software assets with Cloudsmith. We provide one home for all your components, supporting all of your programming languages, teams, and development pipelines. Each and every package pulled into Cloudsmith is fully traceable, giving you insight into what software was built using what dependencies and by which teams and developers.

. Artifacts coming into your Cloudsmith repositories are subject to the policies and controls that you configure. SBOMs contain all of the components and dependencies, and Cloudsmith ensures the authenticity and origin of your artifacts by scanning your packages for malware and CVE.

 Cloudsmith makes it easy to establish rules-based protocols for handling low, medium, and critical software vulnerabilities so that risks are stopped and quarantined before they can do damage.

Stay in control of your software supply chain

. Build usage policies, pin dependencies, segregate environments, and use package promotion workflows to ensure the right teams, people, and systems have access to use the packages that meet your specific needs.

Continuously monitor and protect your software supply chain.

 Cloudsmith is cloud-based, offering enhanced speed, security, and ease of use. Our multi-tenant, global infrastructure means you can rely on the platform to scale to meet your needs and not worry about troublesome upgrades that lead to lost productivity and developer frustration.

Mastering software supply chain security audits is not just a matter of implementing a set of procedures; it's a continuous commitment to safeguarding your digital ecosystem. As we've seen with high-profile breaches and the rise in attack frequency and sophistication, no organization can afford to overlook this crucial aspect of cybersecurity.

By maintaining an inventory of your software supply chain, vigilantly assessing vulnerabilities, promptly addressing them, and continuously monitoring for new threats, you can create a robust defence against the ever-evolving landscape of digital risks.

Cloudsmith plays a pivotal role in securing the software supply chains of diverse and global clients like PagerDuty, Stack Overflow, FontAwesome, Shopify, and RabbitMQ. With Cloudsmith, the fast, modern artifact management platform, you can ensure that your software supply chain remains secure, resilient, and ahead of the curve in cybersecurity. 

Claire Speedy

Senior Marketing Manager

How to Audit Your Software Supply Chain Security

Observability is emerging as critical DevOps practice to predict, prevent, identify, and address issues in the distributed, dynamic, complex, and constantly evolving applications and infrastructures that characterize modern software systems. Wisely, many teams are adopting observability tools like Datadog, Elastic, and AWS Athena to aggregate logs from their build tooling and better visualize and understand the state of their entire system.

But, observability tools are only as good as the logs they consume.

A high-caliber artifact management solution should be a rich, central source of information about your software supply chain; after all, it hosts your software and your dependencies. This is why we invest heavily in the quality of Cloudsmith’s logs and make sure they’re easy for you to extract your logs and integrate into your observability tools.

Sharpening your vision with Cloudsmith logs

Our logs give you granular visibility into your entire lifecycle of artifacts, user interactions, and system behavior so you can proactively monitor, debug, and optimize your software supply chain and operations. We provide these three main types of logs:

Reduce risk and react faster with audit logs

 audit logs are essential for robust cybersecurity and compliance strategies. Organizational audit logs capture events across your organization, including the creation and deletion of repositories and modifications to settings.

Repository audit logs offer a timeline of non-package actions within a repo (typically administrative activities), like modifying retention rules or creating an entitlement token.

Together, they offer a comprehensive view, and analyzing these detailed records can be extremely useful for the following:

Identify and respond to unauthorized access attempts or suspicious activities in the audit logs.

Trigger alerts for any unusual patterns or anomalies in user activities that indicate a potential security threat.

Track changes in repository settings or retention rules to ensure compliance with organizational policies.

Monitor and audit user actions to meet compliance requirements and regulatory standards.

Investigate and troubleshoot specific issues reported by users or identified through audit logs.

Cloudsmith Blog

The DevOps Guide to Mitigating Software Supply Chain Risks

Of Course We Embrace Open Source!

Secure Docker Image Pulls from Cloudsmith to Kubernetes using OIDC

How to Audit Your Software Supply Chain Security

Improving Observability With Cloudsmith Logs

The Dangers Lurking in Open Source Software

Securely Connect Cloudsmith to your CI/CD using OIDC Authentication

Cloudsmith's Enhanced Security with Policy Management

How to Manage Your Vulnerability Workflows with Cloudsmith

Cloudsmith, the JFrog Bintray Alternative & Replacement