Cloudsmith: Secure alternative to AWS CodeArtifact for modern software supply chains
AWS CodeArtifact stores packages. It doesn't secure them. Here's why teams are switching.
Four reasons engineering teams switch from AWS CodeArtifact to Cloudsmith
Cloudsmith vs AWS CodeArtifact
Migration planning resources
We’ve compiled a no-pressure guide to help you assess a migration project. While every migration is driven by a bespoke support plan, this guide breaks down the key steps involved in most migrations.

Frequently asked questions
Yes. Cloudsmith gives you everything CodeArtifact offers, plus supply chain security, 30+ package formats, enterprise identity management, and cloud-agnostic architecture. It's purpose-built for teams that have outgrown a basic package store.
Most migrations for small-to-medium setups can be completed in hours to a few days. Larger enterprise migrations with complex access policies and many repositories may take longer. Enterprise customers receive a dedicated migration engineer to scope and manage the full process.
Yes. Cloudsmith supports all eight formats available in CodeArtifact (npm, PyPI, Maven, NuGet, Swift, RubyGems, Cargo, and generic packages) plus 20+ additional formats including Docker, Debian, Helm, Alpine, and more.
No, CodeArtifact has no built-in security scanning of any kind. Cloudsmith includes vulnerability scanning, malware detection, licence compliance, and SBOM generation out of the box.
Yes. Cloudsmith integrates natively with AWS CodeBuild, CodePipeline, and IAM via OIDC, and works just as well outside AWS. It's cloud-agnostic by design.
CodeArtifact is cheaper at low volumes. Cloudsmith is priced for teams that need security, governance, and multi-format support, capabilities that would otherwise require separate tooling on top of CodeArtifact.