As software supply chain attacks become more sophisticated, organizations have shifted from "why" to "how." We’ve moved past simply discussing the need to protect sources and secure builds. Today, the industry relies on frameworks like Source-to-Container-to-Factory (S2C2F) to provide a blueprint for software supply chain integrity.

However, a critical gap remains: How do you measure success? Adopting a framework is only the first step. To achieve true software supply chain security, you must move from subjective trust to objective measurement. In this final post of our series, we explore seven key software supply chain security metrics that indicate real S2C2F maturity.

Why metrics are essential for software supply chain integrity

Security without measurement is guesswork. Many organizations claim to have a secure software supply chain, but struggle to answer basic questions like:

• Can we prove where our production artifacts came from?
• How quickly do we detect new dependency risks?
• Are security policies enforced, or just documented?

Software supply chain integrity depends on visibility, enforcement, and accountability. Metrics turn those concepts into something observable and repeatable. More importantly, they shift security from a reactive function to a governed system, ideally managed within a secure artifact repository.

Quick reference: S2C2F metrics and maturity mapping

The 7 key metrics for a secure software supply chain

1. Artifact provenance coverage

• What it measures: The percentage of production artifacts with verifiable, cryptographically signed provenance.
• Why it matters: If you can’t prove how an artifact was built, who built it, and what went into it, you’re relying on trust instead of evidence. Provenance is the foundation of software artifact security.
• S2C2F signal: High coverage indicates a strong source and builds integrity, while preserving traceability throughout the artifact lifecycle.

2. Signed artifact adoption rate

• What it measures: How many artifacts in your repositories are signed and verified before use. 
• Why it matters: Unsigned artifacts are indistinguishable from tampered ones. A secure software supply chain depends on cryptographic verification, not naming conventions or environment assumptions.
• S2C2F signal: Mature teams enforce signature verification at the artifact repository level, not just in CI.

3. SBOM completeness and freshness

• What it measures: Whether Software Bills of Materials (SBOMs) are complete, accurate, and generated per artifact version.
• Why it matters: An outdated or partial SBOM creates false confidence. SBOMs are only useful when they reflect exactly what was shipped, including transitive dependencies.
• S2C2F signal: High SBOM completeness supports transparency, auditability, and rapid incident response.

4. Mean time to dependency risk detection (MTDR)

• What it measures: How quickly new vulnerabilities, malicious packages, or license issues are detected after entering the supply chain.
• Why it matters: Speed matters more than perfection. The longer a risky dependency lives in your pipeline, the greater the blast radius.
• S2C2F signal: Short MTDR indicates continuous verification instead of periodic scanning.

5. Policy enforcement rate across CI/CD

• What it measures: The percentage of builds, promotions, and downloads governed by enforceable security policies.
• Why it matters: Security guidelines without enforcement don’t reduce risk. Policy must be automatic, consistent, and unavoidable.
• S2C2F signal: High enforcement rates reflect a shift from advisory controls to preventative ones.

6. Artifact reuse vs. rebuild ratio

• What it measures: How often teams reuse verified artifacts instead of rebuilding the same components across environments.
• Why it matters: Rebuilding introduces inconsistency, increases attack surface, and weakens traceability. Reuse strengthens integrity and simplifies audits.
• S2C2F signal: Mature organizations promote trusted artifacts through environments rather than recreating them.

7. Exposure window for vulnerable artifacts

• What it measures: The time between vulnerability disclosure and when affected artifacts are blocked, quarantined, or replaced.
• Why it matters: Every hour a vulnerable artifact remains available is measurable risk.
• S2C2F signal: Short exposure windows indicate automated response and strong artifact management for supply chain security.

How these metrics reflect S2C2F maturity

Taken together, these software supply chain security metrics reveal more than individual control gaps. They show whether S2C2F principles are operationalized within the organization.

Organizations with low S2C2F maturity often:

• Rely on CI logs instead of artifact metadata.
• Detect risk late in the lifecycle (often at deployment).
• Enforce security inconsistently across different teams.

High-maturity teams:

• Treat the artifact as the system of record: All security metadata is attached directly to the artifact.
• Measure trust, not intent: They don't care what the developer intended to build; they only care what the cryptographic signature proves was built.
• Use artifact management for security: They utilize a secure artifact repository as a security gate, not just a storage bucket.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

• How do you measure software supply chain security?

You measure it by tracking objective data points across the artifact lifecycle, specifically focusing on provenance coverage, cryptographic signing rates, and the speed of vulnerability detection (MTDR).

• What are S2C2F metrics?

S2C2F metrics are specific indicators used to track the implementation of the Source-to-Container-to-Factory framework. They include artifact integrity checks, build service security, and dependency trust levels.

• How do you measure S2C2F maturity?

S2C2F maturity is measured by the degree of automation and enforcement in your pipeline. Level 1 focuses on basic visibility, while Level 4 requires automated policy enforcement, reproducible builds, and 100% provenance coverage.

• How do you track software supply chain integrity?

Integrity is tracked through a combination of SBOMs, cryptographic signatures, and "attestations" stored within a secure artifact repository. These tools provide a verifiable record that the software has not been tampered with.

Closing the series: From framework to outcomes

Throughout this series, we explored:

• What software supply chain integrity really means.
• How S2C2F strengthens open source and build security.
• The core principles behind trusted software delivery.
• The role of artifact management in enabling maturity.

This final step, measurement, is where theory becomes practice. When organizations clearly measure trust, integrity, and risk across their software artifacts, supply chain security stops being aspirational. It becomes operational.

And that’s what true S2C2F maturity looks like.

Book a demo to learn how Cloudsmith accelerates your path to S2C2F maturity.